| Nukes back in Suffolk? on 11:53 - Aug 30 with 1732 views | Steve_M |
I read that yesterday, struck me as a desperate attempt to find outrage based on some suppositions. |  |
|  |
| [Redacted] on 12:09 - Aug 30 with 1679 views | victorywilhappen |
| Nukes back in Suffolk? on 11:53 - Aug 30 by Steve_M |
I read that yesterday, struck me as a desperate attempt to find outrage based on some suppositions. |
[Redacted] |  | | |
| Nukes back in Suffolk? on 12:25 - Aug 30 with 1617 views | chicoazul |
Strongly suspect they have never left
👀 |  |
| |
| [Redacted] on 12:32 - Aug 30 with 1586 views | victorywilhappen |
| Nukes back in Suffolk? on 12:25 - Aug 30 by chicoazul |
Strongly suspect they have never left
👀 |
[Redacted] | | | |
| Nukes back in Suffolk? on 12:34 - Aug 30 with 1578 views | wischip |
| Nukes back in Suffolk? on 12:25 - Aug 30 by chicoazul |
Strongly suspect they have never left
👀 |
Just like the aliens in Rendelsham Forest and the big cats living in the wild. |  | | |
| Nukes back in Suffolk? on 12:42 - Aug 30 with 1561 views | stonojnr |
| Nukes back in Suffolk? on 12:25 - Aug 30 by chicoazul |
Strongly suspect they have never left
👀 |
I'd be more surprised if they didn't have any at Lakenheath, given the clear role F15s have in air defence, which the article misses the fact F15E was the first plane capable of carrying the B61-12 and Lakenheath has had those for over 30 years. |  | | |
| Nukes back in Suffolk? on 13:41 - Aug 30 with 1396 views | Basuco |
| Nukes back in Suffolk? on 12:25 - Aug 30 by chicoazul |
Strongly suspect they have never left
👀 |
I occasionally had to work in the Nuclear weapon storage area at Lakenheath in the 80's, it was difficult and a pain to get in and if you did not get the entry procedure correct they let you in the first gate but then wouldn't let you in through the next gate or out of the first. I agree with Stonojnr, I would be very surprised if they did actually remove all nuclear weapons from Lakenheath. |  | | |
| Nukes back in Suffolk? on 18:13 - Aug 30 with 1222 views | factual_blue |
What makes you think they ever left?
*taps side of nose in a conspiratorial manner* |  |
| |
Login to get fewer ads
| [Redacted] on 18:57 - Aug 30 with 1153 views | victorywilhappen |
| Nukes back in Suffolk? on 18:13 - Aug 30 by factual_blue |
What makes you think they ever left?
*taps side of nose in a conspiratorial manner* |
[Redacted] | | | |
| Nukes back in Suffolk? on 19:06 - Aug 30 with 1141 views | You_Bloo_Right |
| Nukes back in Suffolk? on 18:13 - Aug 30 by factual_blue |
What makes you think they ever left?
*taps side of nose in a conspiratorial manner* |
Well there is certainly no suitable container for nuclear weapon disposal at Bury recycling centre.
So that was one avenue for their removal closed. |  |
| |
| Nukes back in Suffolk? on 19:14 - Aug 30 with 1113 views | Swansea_Blue |
| Nukes back in Suffolk? on 19:06 - Aug 30 by You_Bloo_Right |
Well there is certainly no suitable container for nuclear weapon disposal at Bury recycling centre.
So that was one avenue for their removal closed. |
They’ll just dump it there anyway. They’re not going to worry about the sort of people that use Bury recycling centre. |  |
| |
| Nukes back in Suffolk? on 19:42 - Aug 30 with 1057 views | thatbdude |
Sudbury to the south...Bungay to the north.... |  |
| |
| Nukes back in Suffolk? on 20:34 - Aug 30 with 979 views | factual_blue |
| Nukes back in Suffolk? on 19:06 - Aug 30 by You_Bloo_Right |
Well there is certainly no suitable container for nuclear weapon disposal at Bury recycling centre.
So that was one avenue for their removal closed. |
That's precisely what they WANT you to think. | |
| |
| Nukes back in Suffolk? on 22:28 - Aug 30 with 904 views | You_Bloo_Right |
| Nukes back in Suffolk? on 20:34 - Aug 30 by factual_blue |
That's precisely what they WANT you to think. |
But these barrels are just for unwanted paint aren't they?
 | |
| |
| |
By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions.
